Thursday
God Reveals His Secrets
I woke up with this on my mind recently and I’ve been chewing on it for a while.
The phrase, “his servants the prophets” suggests there are some prophets who are not submitted as servants to him. He apparently doesn’t reveal his secret to them. The gift is not enough; I need to be fully on-board with him.
Application: I don’t need to listen to prophets who are not God’s servants, whether they’ve anointed themselves or they’re servants of something else (Money? Sex? Power?), or they’ve just fallen off the wagon. Discernment (personal & corporate) is a big advantage here.
The same phrase also suggests that there are some servants who are not prophets. In the days of Amos, there were just a few who had God’s spirit and spoke for him; in our days, well he’s instructed every believer to earnestly desire to prophesy [1Corinthians 14:1].
Application: being fully his is not sufficient; prophets need to speak what God says and when he says to. They need to be called for the purpose of speaking his word to the community. More than that, I need to not pay attention to the “prophecies” from God’s people who are not actually anointed by God to speak for him at this time. Discernment is a big advantage here, too.
I'm going to over-simplify this and say that there are things that he doesn’t reveal, except to people who are comfortable hearing his voice and who are fully committed to him.
The other thing that’s captured my attention is the Hebrew word “sôḏ,” which is variously translated “secret,” “plans,” “counsel.” A couple of translations render it “secret counsel” in this verse, which I think is pretty interesting.
Hold on, this might get nerdly for a minute.
Strong defines H5475 (our Hebrew word “sôḏ,”) as “a session, that is, company of persons (in close deliberation); by implication intimacy, consultation, a secret,” and
Gesenius points out that outside of the Bible, the word speaks of a couch, cushion, triclinium, on which persons recline, hence, (1) a sitting together, an assembly, either of friends or of judges, (2) deliberation, counsel, (3) familiar conversation, or (4) a secret.
In any case, this strikes me as a complex word; no wonder there are so many ways to translate it.
But the imagery in Amos is getting clearer: he invites individuals who are fully his and who are comfortable hearing his voice into a quiet place with himself, where he discusses what’s on his heart. And the imagery is pretty clear: this is not one “big guy” dictating what’s going to happen; this is peers in conversation, in dialog, in deliberation together.
And according to Amos, he doesn’t do anything apart from this sort of counsel, without discussing it with these people in this setting.
It could be argued that he has required that it be this way. In the Psalms, he declares that "The highest heavens belong to the LORD, but the earth he has given to mankind." [Psalm 115:16] If he takes that seriously, then he has delegated authority for this planet to us, and no good leader delegates authority to someone else and then steps in, usurps the delegate, and does things on his own authority.
So for God to take action in the affairs of Earth, he needs to first discuss his secret counsel with his human friends, who now carry the authority for action on the Earth.
The Bible Contains Lies. It Says So.
Let me back up. I’ve just finished the book of Job. That’s a hard read, for me, anyway. The book has several sections:
• Chapters 1&2: The Set Up. The conversations in Heaven between God and the devil (that Job never knows about!), and the resulting destruction of Job’s life.
• Chapters 3 – 31: Job arguing with his “friends,” Eliphaz the Temanite, Bildad the Shuhite, and Zophar the Naamathite. Mostly, Job is proclaiming his innocence and these three are telling him what God is like and why Job is wrong.
• Chapters 32 – 37: The lecture from “Elihu son of Barakel the Buzite, of the family of Ram.” Mostly, he’s defending God.
• Chapters 38 – 41: God speaks up. Essentially, “This is above your pay grade, Son,” but how beautifully he says it!
• Chapter 42: Job repents, God chews out Eliphaz, Bildad & Zophar, God restores Job.
The verse that stuck out to me most strongly this time was this:
"After the LORD had said these things to Job, he said to Eliphaz the Temanite, “I am angry with you and your two friends, because you have not spoken the truth about me, as my servant Job has.” [Job 42:7]
And I realized that God just declared that much of Job 3 – Job 31 is “not the truth” about God. That means there are lies there! In the Bible! <Gasp!>
(He also declares that Job was telling the truth when he protested that he was innocent in his suffering.)
So God says at least 29 chapters of my Bible contain lies. That’s worth thinking about.
Keep in mind that “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” [2 Timothy 3:16-17]
So it’s “God-breathed.” Other translations read “given by inspiration of God or “breathed out by God.” But that doesn’t mean that every word is literally true or actually factual. It means that it’s inspired by God, motivated by God through the men who wrote the stuff down. It’s still profitable for teaching, rebuking & correcting, certainly.
But not every bit of Scripture is actually, factually correct, at least not these 29 chapters in Job. Don’t get me wrong: the Bible is telling the truth when it records the lies these yahoos are telling about God. But they are still lies, and they’re still in the Bible.
I wonder if there are other places, passages that are also inspired by God, where Scripture (accurately) records people saying stupid things, untrue things? (And I won’t even get into the question of where God is speaking metaphorically or symbolically.)
The Bible contains lies. It says so.
So apparently, more skill is required when employing the Bible than merely swallowing everything whole. That’s kind of true for all of life, isn’t it?
Led by Scripture?
This
story has been bugging me:
Then
he brought Him to Jerusalem, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple,
and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down
from here. "For it is written: 'He shall give His angels charge
over you, To keep you,' "and, 'In their hands they shall bear
you up, Lest you dash your foot against a stone.' " And Jesus
answered and said to him, "It has been said, 'You shall not
tempt the LORD your God.' " - Luke 4:9-12
I’ve
been taught, and I’ll bet you have too, to base my choices and my
requests on Scripture. If I can support it from the pages of the
Bible, I’m safe.
This
passage puts the lie to that. In this story, Luci asks Jesus to do
something, AND HE SUPPORTS IT WITH SCRIPTURE! This is the secret code
we’ve been taught to trust blindly, and the devil is using it to tempt Jesus! 😲
• Luci (the debbil) was the one making the request.
• JC had a better understanding of the whole counsel of Scripture, and recognized that this use (with scripture!) violated the bigger issues.
• Jesus only did what he saw Father doing (John 5:19), and apparently Father wasn’t showing off by skydiving from a clifftop, waiting for God to rescue him from the law of gravity and from the consequences of his own choice.
• We could add that the quote (from Deuteronomy 8) was out of context, but the worst out-of-context quoter of Scripture that I know is Scripture itself. (But that’s another conversation).
I realize that I’ve done this. I’ve done this: I’ve taken verses as approval for my wishes and choices, and expected God to jump through my hoops. And then I’ve gotten angry or disappointed when he didn’t.
Principle: just because I can find somebody doing it in the Bible doesn’t mean it’s God’s will for my life. Or that it’s safe.
Principle: Yes, look for what Scripture says on the topic, but don’t stop there. Engage Holy Spirit, involve mature brothers & sisters.
Most importantly, know your Father’s heart, so when somebody tries to use Scripture to pull you away from his heart, you’ll know better and not follow that slimy trail.
Issachar, the Cat
Oh
my. God's using my cat to teach me a lesson again. Awkward.
Our
cat gets a healthy breakfast. Then she gets lunch at 1:30 or 2:00.
(She's a very well-fed cat.)
I
don't eat breakfast. They call it intermittent fasting; I have
breakfast at noon. (It keeps me from being a "very well-fed"
human.)
So
I was in the kitchen at noon the other day, chopping up the toppings for the
personal pizza I was going to have for breakfast. And the cat
saunters in, all affectionate, assuming that since I was in the
kitchen, I must be preparing lunch for her.
I scritched her neck and she purred. Then she started to yowl when I didn’t get the hint, so I walked away. We repeated the cycle two or three times before she gave up and walked away and sulked. I went back to slicing peppers and shredding cheese.
Then I heard the whisper. "It's easy to misunderstand what time it is if you depend on someone else for that information."
Immediately 1 Chronicles 12:32 came to my mind. "...from Issachar [came] men who understood the times and knew what Israel should do."
Personally, I believe it's more important in these days than ever before in my own lifetime at least, to understand the times and to know how to respond in the midst of these days.
And I cannot (I MUST not) depend on somebody's prophetic word, or what my pastor preaches about, or what that person on Facebook writes about. I must understand the times from knowing my Father, from walking with Jesus, from listening to Holy Spirit.
It's awkward when I get misled by gifted saints who are walking in step with God. It's awkward when I follow what they're proclaiming rather than what Father is whispering.
The Sugar Daddy
I've had a few people in my life over the
years that seemed to see me as a sugar daddy. Whatever they wanted,
they told me about it and expected me to get it for them.
Sometimes
that's been my kids or my grand kids when they were little, and in
those circumstances, it certainly is normal, and I think maybe even
healthy.
But when people who appear to be adults take that
role it gets awkward. It seems that Father is bringing this to my
attention rather a lot recently. So I'm thinking about it.
One
line of thinking that I have been working on is that if this is
uncomfortable for me, does that also mean that it's uncomfortable for
God, if I only come to him with my wants and needs?
The
reality is that he is not a man, and his reactions are going to be
different than mine. But I still think that's going to be an inferior
way of relating with him, through the Christmas list.
If
nothing else, relating to God through my list of wants and needs is a
sure fire way to discern my immaturity. That's the only appropriate
for children, young children. With God, it's only appropriate for
babes in Christ.
Another line of thinking here has been
about how relating through the wish list changes how I deal with
life, and not for the better.
That's focusing on my wants
and needs, in other words it's focusing on my lack. That's never a
healthy way to relate, either to life, or to God.
This
leads me to a similar topic that father and I have been discussing
recently. It's easy to look at life, it's easy to look at what other
people have, and view it in light of what I want, or what I need.
We have all seen those spam ads on social media. "Click
like, and share this with your friends, and you will get a chance to
win one of these." (First of all, 99% of those are a pure
fiction. Nobody ever wins them. They are what is called "Like
Farms," and they will sell the social interaction to
unscrupulous advertisers later on.")
Or the posts
that asked your opinion: " Do you like the red one or the blue
one or the brown one?" (Yeah, more "Like Farms. ") These are clear temptations to be unsatisfied with God's provision for you.
A
more subtle version of this one is when somebody shares a testimony
of what God has done for them, it's a temptation for me anyway, to
react with a desire for that blessing rather than praise for what
God has done for them. This one masquerades as spiritual maturity,
spiritual hunger. It's not. It's the flesh.
Personally, I
am working to rid my thinking of, "I want that," or "I
want one like that for me." (Remember, this is my process, not
necessarily yours.)
Wanting that, whatever "that"
is, only serves to stir up the lust of the eyes, the lust of the
flesh, or the boastful pride of life. I hear those are not good
things.
So yeah, this involves more awareness of my own
self. It involves being on guard a little bit more than I used to be.
It does not however mean doing away with any desires, goals and
aspirations.
If I really do want that, rather than just
engaging my flesh to meditate on it, I tried to bring it to Father.
It's my goal to discuss it with him, and if it gets his and my
approval, then I will ask him for it. I will also probably discuss
with him what I need to do in that process, so that I don't retreat
him as a sugar daddy.
This represents a change I am
working to implement in my life: becoming less reactive, and more
proactive, more intentional.
I want to be a mature son,
working with him in the administration of his kingdom, not a whiny
toddler fussing about my wants and needs.
I remind you
again, this is what he's doing in me. He may or may not be doing this
in you. On the other hand, if this offends you, if this makes you
angry, he may actually want to make a change like this one in you
too.
Think of this as an invitation to grow in maturity, if he's taking you this way.
Wednesday
Which Gifts From God Don't Need God's Power?
Thursday
Sometimes we fire blanks.

A Very Messy Narrow Way
I have some children, and now they have children. And of course, once upon a time, I was a young child myself.

But all in all, there’s WAY more “yes and amen” than “do not touch” in the Kingdom of God.
Go forth. Explore. Discover your freedom.
“I came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it…”

Target Fixation
Philippians 4:8 “Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.”
In these passages, God’s telling us to focus our attention on stuff that – should we actually put our attention on them – we’d become “excellent” and “praiseworthy” in our character; we’d become Christ-like.
But regardless of the result, it’s still a command. “Do this.” “Think about such things.” “Fix your eyes on Jesus.”
Are We Mere Men?

Audacious Prayer

Baby, That's Not Love
Wednesday
What is a Tidal Wave, really?

Thursday
Mixing Promises with Faith
Believers Who Find Fault
Favorite targets for these people include:
a) Famous Christians (“Did you know that this famous leader once sinned? Gasp!”),
b) Politicians (This doesn't need much explanation; there aren’t many Christians who can say positive things about all three: Trump, Clinton and Obama),
c) Poignant Facebook posts (“Martin Luther is an evil man because some of his followers did bad things!”)

When I run across people who have to begin their conversation with criticism or “We need to know both sides of that!” then I’m afraid I make the assumption that this is a person who is more influenced by the news media than by the Spirit of God. (I don’t like assumptions, particularly in myself.)
Our Instruction Book gives us certain standards for our behavior, and for our conversation with each other, standards like “Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt.” (Colossians 4:6)
And one of those standards is not fault-finding: Proverbs 11:12 “People without good sense find fault with their neighbors, but those with understanding keep quiet.” & Jude 1:16 “These people are grumblers and faultfinders; they follow their own evil desires; they boast about themselves and flatter others for their own advantage.”
Another of those standards is the solution: fixing our attention on whatsoever is good and right. Philippians 4:8: “Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.”.
Faultfinding is a fundamental failure to meet Scriptural standards, I’m afraid. It’s also something I aggressively discourage in conversations on this page (as I am doing in this post).
Off the record, my motivation for discouraging this is not Scripture: you are responsible for your own response to that standard; that’s not my job.

If you want to find fault with people, living or dead, do it somewhere else. If you to take a crap, don’t use my swimming pool for that purpose.
Thanks!
Does the Bible Tell Lies?
If somebody is telling you a flat-out lie, and I report, “This is what they’re saying,” without describing it as the truth or as a lie, Then am I telling you the truth to you? Or am I lying to you?
Related to that:

Of course, I’m going to argue that if the Bible is just reporting what they said, that this it is telling the truth, even if what it is truthfully reporting is a lie. Even when the Bible accurately quotes their lying words, it is telling the truth, and you can have confidence that they did, indeed, tell that lie.
For example, when Bildad the Shuhite says to Job, “When your children sinned against him, [God] gave them over to the penalty of their sin,” [Job 8:4] and the Bible truthfully reports Bildad’s fake news, then the Bible is still speaking the truth, even if Job’s children never sinned, and even if Bildad can’t tell his sphincter from a scepter.
Or when the Bible accurately quotes a snake calling God a liar, and declaring “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil,” [Genesis 3:5], then the Bible is still telling the truth, even though the words it is quoting are a flat-out lie, literally straight from the devil’s mouth.
This leads to a very awkward and uncomfortable place. I’m going to say this bluntly:
- Not everything the Bible says is true.
- Some of what the Bible says is a lie, because
- Sometimes the Bible truthfully reports people’s lies.
That’s going to trigger some folks, but take a deep breath and think about it: we’ve just discussed two specific lies that the Bible quotes. The Bible accurately (“truthfully”) reports the lies. But they’re still lies. They’re still in the Bible. The Bible contains these two lies (and many more).
What’s even more challenging is that the Bible doesn’t generally identify whether people are speaking the truth or telling a lie, just like it doesn’t comment on whether what they’re doing is wise or stupid. It never commented that the snake was lying, or that Bildad was lying.
And there are some epic examples of stupid choices and stupid thinking that the Bible reports to us. If you think about it, you can think of several yourself.
“But what about that verse that says it’s all inspired?”
The verse actually says, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.” [2 Timothy 3:16] Yep. That’s what it says. And yes, this is true!
So yeah, it’s still good for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness. Some of it, by virtue of accurately reporting people’s stupid choices, is particularly helpful for the rebuking and correcting parts! (Yes, David really did seduce his good friend’s wife, and then murder that friend to cover it up. No, we are not teaching that you need to do the same thing!)
In other words, yes, the Bible is still precious, and it is still God-breathed and useful nutrition for saints. But like all nutrition, some of it needs to be chewed well before the nutrients are available to help saints grow.
Don’t just grab pieces and swallow them whole. Find out who said it, who they said it to, and the circumstances they were said in. Learn to chew your food carefully.